Welcome to the Curriculum & Leadership Journal website.
To receive our fortnightly Email Alert,
please click on the blue menu item below.
Curriculum & Leadership Journal
An electronic journal for leaders in education
ISSN: 1448-0743
Follow us on twitter

Abstracts

Reforming languages education in Australian schools: beware the quick fix!

Volume 12 Number 1,  2008; Pages 38–39
Andrew Ferguson

The MLTAV welcomes the Australian Government’s commitment to re-establish a national strategy for the teaching of Asian languages, ‘but not if this strategy is introduced as a “quick fix” solution’, and especially not if it comes at the expense of existing language programs. To focus policy on the teaching of a few ‘priority languages’ would be to forego the social and economic benefits offered by Australia’s diverse cultural heritage, including the country's Indigenous heritage and numerous Indigenous languages. Teaching the range of languages spoken in Australia is a direct acknowledgement of the cultures associated with them, and is therefore important in promoting social cohesion. Economically, it is unrealistic to target only a few countries because the importance of Australia’s main individual trading partners will continue to fluctuate over time and because Australia trades with a wide range of nations. Truly valuable preparation consists of encouraging students to become skilled, flexible and motivated learners of languages in general. In this way they will be able to learn the languages they need, which are unknowable in advance, they will gain the recognised cognitive development that derives from learning any additional language, and they will be aided in the learning of English. It is significant that the notion of ‘priority’ languages does not feature in two major documents on Australian language education, The Future of Schooling in Australia and the Blueprint for Education and Training published April 2007 by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI). At K–10 level languages education should be delivered by a qualified LOTE teacher for 150 minutes per week. Language courses should be coordinated between primary and secondary schools. Wide-ranging language education will prepare students for life in a globalised society where they are likely to deal, in Australia and elsewhere, with speakers of other languages. The position paper is available on the MLTAV website.

Key Learning Areas

Languages

Subject Headings

Language and languages
Education policy
Educational planning
Victoria
Australia

How should we teach early reading?

Summer 2008; Pages 12–13
Dominic Wyse

In England, the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) curriculum is to become mandatory from September 2008. The goals that the curriculum sets out for reading emphasise the need for children to develop skills related to phonics. However, the authoritative report Teaching Children to Read from the USA’s National Reading Panel (NRP) concluded that ‘systematic phonics instruction should be integrated with other reading instruction to create a balanced reading program’ and that phonics ‘should not become the dominant component in a reading program’. Other studies have also found a range of teaching approaches effective, including those where systematic phonics instruction is integrated with whole language or literature-based teaching, whole word teaching or with comprehension work. The EYFS website includes a link to the Rose Report, a government-sponsored report which strongly and specifically recommends synthetic phonics as a teaching method. However, another government-sponsored report by Torgerson et al, also noted on the EYFS website, found that no one form of systematic phonics instruction was more effective than any other. England ‘is alone in its imposition of synthetic phonics’. Mandating the teaching of synthetic phonics represents ‘state interference and micro management’. Children who enter school already able to read should be able to focus on skills such as comprehension rather than decoding. Intentionally or not, official policy is promoting the notion that there is ‘one correct way’ to teach reading, an idea likely to be taken up by many parents. However, previous attempts to impose systematic phonics instruction in England antagonised teachers. Assessment of children’s reading should be evaluated not only in terms of phonics skills but also in relation to their interest in books and their comprehension, according to the NRP report. More generally, research findings have challenged the validity of statutory tests as a measure of instructional effectiveness. Policy should be developed in collaboration between practitioners, academics and policy makers. The timing of its introduction should reflect the magnitude of the task in developing it, rather than ‘political imperatives fuelled by the media’. We need ‘professional and societal debate with those we elect to serve us, not to control us’.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Reading
Literacy
Great Britain
Education policy
Educational evaluation
English language teaching
Early childhood education

Incorporating phonics within a New Zealand whole language program

Volume 42 Number 1&2,  2007; Pages 143–159

The teaching of reading and writing in New Zealand primary schools is usually taught using the whole language approach through which children listen to stories and engage in shared, individual, guided and independent reading and writing tasks. However, an experienced New Zealand primary teacher, ‘Mary’, found that her students’ results improved after she incorporated a component of synthetic phonics within her whole language program. She applied synthetic phonics to a Grade 1 class of 24 children and a Grade 2 class of 22 children the following year. Neither class had previous experience of phonics-based instruction. New Zealand curriculum guidelines recommend the application of phonics at incidental teaching moments, rather than as a pre-planned activity, but this approach is too haphazard to guarantee it is applied to all children who would benefit from it. Mary adapted the Jolly Phonics program. The Grade 1 class was taught letter sounds, introduced according to their frequency and usefulness in word building using the program's Phonics Handbook. In the second half of the year the children progressed to the Grammar Handbook 1 which called on children to focus on one spelling pattern and one grammatical feature. Phonics in the Grade 2 class included revisions of letter sounds and spelling at the start of lessons, followed by reinforcement of these connections through various exercises such as class singing. Once basic knowledge of letter sounds was established, the teaching emphasis moved to words with irregular spelling. Shared writing exercises were linked to the sounds and spelling patterns covered earlier in the program. Assessment through running records and Burt test scores showed that students in both classes made ‘at least twice the amount of progress than would be expected’. The school’s high-SES context is unlikely to explain this increase, given earlier research on correlations between SES and Burt reading scores, and given the children’s rapid rate of progress. The article includes timetables describing the literacy components within typical school days for each class. The author also describes the balance between whole class and individualised instruction in Mary’s classes.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Reading
Literacy
English language teaching
New Zealand
Primary education
Phonetics

Creating culturally-safe schools for Maori students

Volume 36,  2007; Pages 65–76
Angus Macfarlane, Ted Glynn, Tom Cavanagh, Sonja Bateman

Four scholars in the field of multicultural education have collaborated to propose ideas for helping Māori students feel free to express their own language and culture in New Zealand schools. While the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi formally grants Māori people the right to self-determination over their resources, including their culture and language, in reality the relationship between Māori and Pākehā (European-descended) has been an unequal one. Angus Macfarlane’s ‘Educultural Wheel’ identifies a number of essential focal points for improving behaviour and learning outcomes in Māori students. Teachers must try to build mutually trusting and respectful relationships with students based on kinship, locality and common interests. Competent teachers possess mana, a quality of dignity and integrity, and perceive and work to develop the mana of their students. An ethos of care and an underlying unity and bonding in the classroom are critical. Incorporating Māori cultural practices such as Te hui whakatika (meeting to make amends after a transgression has occurred) is an effective way of resolving conflict without punishment, suspension or exclusion from school. The Hikairo Rationale, also developed by Macfarlane, focuses on problem behaviours. The rationale emphasises holistic wellbeing and involves elements such as establishing meaningful relationships with students, using the curriculum to encourage cultural identity, and showing genuine care and respect for students who have misbehaved. A project conducted by Tom Cavanagh at Raglan Area School highlighted Māori students’ need to feel respected and proud of their heritage. Teachers and school personnel are asked to acknowledge the preferred Māori methods of learning, whanau (wisdom) and karakia (prayer). Senior Māori students should be allowed to express themselves in a variety of ways and use whole-brain learning strategies. Learning to develop and heal relationships is also of central importance. The extended family of the school should encourage teachers to learn more about Māori culture and perspectives. Creating a culturally safe school for Māori students will involve listening to the voices of Māori students and ensuring that their cultural identity is not at odds with classroom success.

KLA

Subject Headings

Mäori
Mäori Education
Social life and customs
New Zealand

Climbing the educational mountain: a metaphor for real culture change for Indigenous students in remote schools

Volume 36, 9 August 2007; Pages 6–20
Robyn Hewitson

Remote school education in the Northern Territory has historically been hindered by low expectations, discriminatory pedagogies and lost opportunities. Kalkaringi School, located 480 kilometres southwest of Katherine, was the site of a historic change between late 2001 and 2005 that resulted in the first Indigenous students successfully completing Year 12 at their own community school. All of those students who completed Year 12 in 2005 went on to university, being selected on the basis of their merit rather than their Aboriginality. Unlike standard remote Indigenous educational practice, which has tended to focus on making school simple, friendly and fun, Kalkaringi School developed and applied a radical pedagogy based on the work of theorists such as Freire, Horkheimer, Adorno and Giroux. The change was designed to be deep-seated and to challenge widespread assumptions and beliefs, rather than simply rearranging funding or administrative duties. There were several serious policy impediments to this change. In late 2001, community education centres were not recognised as having secondary-level students, even though many did attend. Students aged 12–18 were treated as primary school students and teacher expectations of them were low. Students received tuition for only half the normal school day, equivalent to a 120-week disadvantage over six years, and were offered an extremely limited selection of subjects. Education has been identified as the single most important factor in improving outcomes for Indigenous children. Limited education leads to unemployment and boredom, which in turn provokes crime and often time in prison. Kalkaringi School replaced the previously dominant ‘pedagogy of hopelessness’ with empowering images and change from the ground up. ‘Climbing the mountain’ was selected, after some consideration, as a metaphor to inspire hope and persistence. It was embraced by Indigenous leaders at the school and translated into the local Gurindji language for community meetings.

KLA

Subject Headings

Aboriginal students
Northern Territory
School culture
Rural education

Where do we look now? The future of research in Indigenous Australian education

Volume 36,  2007; Pages 1–4
Neil Harrison

The paradigm governing current research on Indigenous education in Australia is no longer effective. Most research is based on the gap in academic performance between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students, measuring Indigenous performance against a non-Indigenous standard. This approach is reminiscent of research in the 1960s that found differences between girls and boys, and argued from these findings that girls should be brought up to the boys’ standard. Research projects are often initiated because of a perceived ‘pathology of Indigenous education’, with researchers ‘magically’ discovering solutions in their data that end up having little effect. This practice reinforces socially constructed ideas of Aboriginality, forces researchers to blame either student or teacher for performance gaps, and may lead to resentment in important members of the community. Research practices must be re-evaluated. Western research practice rests on the assumption that there is knowledge out in the field to be found, and that a scientific methodology is sufficient to do this. However, new scientific knowledge is always located within, and limited by, the researcher’s methodology. Western education is based on the same principle, with students required to know a predetermined answer in order to participate in classroom discussions. We profess to let students work things out for themselves, but in reality the material and assessment criteria are wholly decided by the teacher. A better means of conducting research into Indigenous education would focus on strengthening relations between researcher and community. Creating a community dedicated to improving the lives of Indigenous Australians through education would transcend the limitations imposed by a binary Indigenous/non-Indigenous research paradigm. Research topics could be organised according to region rather than theme. This would allow Aboriginal groups to discuss key educational issues in their community and enlist researchers to address them. Research teams would then work with the region on an ongoing basis, building relations with community elders. Political and academic expectations on researchers to deliver immediate results are unrealistic and need to be replaced by a valuing of long-term, community-based relations and initiatives.

KLA

Subject Headings

Education research
Aboriginal peoples
Australia

Are assessment data really driving middle school reading instruction? What we can learn from one student's experience

Volume 51 Number 7,  2008; Pages 578–587

The growth of standardised high-stakes testing in the USA has led to an increased reliance on ‘one-size-fits-all’ curricula and assessment tasks. For students in need of remedial reading instruction, a standardised curriculum may be particularly inappropriate. These students often differ substantially in their areas of strength and in the aspects of reading that they find most difficult. A study conducted at one Florida middle school has examined the experiences of one remedial reading student in depth, drawing on interviews with the school principal, the classroom teacher, a teacher aide and the student herself. The school she attended held 968 students, of which 58 per cent qualified for a free lunch and 62 per cent were of a minority background, mostly African–American. The student was a 13-year-old girl in an Exceptional Student Education (ESE) class. Her low score on the Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test (FCAT) had led to her placement in the remedial class. When interviewed she stated that she enjoyed reading and often read books out of school hours. She saw herself as a good reader. However, she found school boring and tended to be quiet and disengaged in class. The ESE teacher and the teacher aide, both dedicated teachers, described her as ‘lazy’ and dismissed the idea of supplying her with more difficult material. The student’s interview included a series of reading tests, which she appeared to enjoy completing. Her scores on beginning elements of literacy, such as letter recognition, phoneme segmentation and decoding efficiency, were very high. She scored less well on measures of fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. The remedial reading curriculum taught in her classroom was state-mandated and primarily addressed decoding skills, an area she did not need to practise. To avoid this type of mismatch it is important to train teachers in the interpretation of various test results, so that a low score in reading can be broken down into more specific components. Funding for remedial programs, rather than being directed towards finding a ‘silver-bullet’ curriculum for all students, should be directed towards measures that will promote creativity and individualised learning in the classroom.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Reading
Reading difficulties
Curriculum planning
Assessment

Literacy as a complex activity: deconstructing the simple view of reading

Volume 42 Number 2, July 2008; Pages 59–66
Morag Stuart, Rhona Stainthorp, Maggie Snowling

The Rose Review that investigated the teaching of early reading recommended that the Searchlights model be replaced by the Simple View of Reading. Some researchers have argued that this amounts to a simplification of the process of becoming literate; however, the Simple View’s straightforward formulation contains substantial complexity and depth. The Searchlights model stated that reading a text requires the use of four sources of information: content knowledge, phonic skills to do with sound and spelling, written word recognition, and grammatical knowledge. However, this model introduced a confound between the skills needed to read single words and those needed for general text comprehension. Text comprehension inevitably involves the prediction of word meaning from surrounding words in the text as well as the interpretation of textual elements in a broader cultural sense. Skilled word reading, on the contrary, should not require guessing from context. Students must learn to recognise words fluently before they begin to infer meanings from context. This does not mean that comprehension strategies should not be taught alongside word recognition. In the Simple View, the two aspects are seen as interdependent. Language comprehension processes are represented as an axis perpendicular to word recognition processes, with both axes ranging from poor to good. In addition, all important aspects of the Searchlights model are represented in the Simple View. The four phases in Ehri’s theory of word reading, pre-, partial, full, and consolidated alphabetic, describe children’s development of word recognition skills. For progression in text comprehension, it should be recognised that listening and reading comprehension most likely draw on a single underlying capacity. Switching to the Simple View of Reading will allow teachers to organise their teaching around a straightforward but powerful principle.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Reading
Literacy
Primary education

Does feeling come first? How poetry can help readers broaden their understanding of metacognition

Volume 51 Number 7, April 2008; Pages 564–576
Amy L. Eva-Wood

The links between text-based literacy study and improved metacognition are well established. It has been suggested that poetry is particularly effective in opening up students to different perspectives and enhancing self-knowledge, two fundamental components of metacognition. A recent study has shown a direct link between one particular method of studying poetry and students’ increased use of a variety of metacognitive comprehension strategies. Forty-one Year 11 American Literature students at a suburban high school in the USA participated in a four-week unit on poetry. The unit was taught jointly by the researcher and the students’ regular classroom teacher, and was based on poems by American poets such as Emily Dickinson, Robert Frost and Langston Hughes. Students used a ‘think-aloud’ protocol that had them comment on their responses in a stream-of-consciousness style as they read the poems aloud. The procedure was modelled separately, unrehearsed, by both the researcher and the classroom teacher before the students implemented it in pairs and then larger groups. They were provided with broad ‘guiding questions’ about what they saw or felt reading the poem, or things that surprised them. Students were asked before and after the unit to list the comprehension strategies they used to understand texts. The total number of self-reported comprehension strategies rose from 20 before the poetry unit to 44 after the unit was completed. This was particularly evident in affectively-based strategies. There was a jump in the number of students who used visualisation and imagery as comprehension strategies, and a sizeable increase in those who identified key words in the text and explored their connotations. Students were also more likely to draw on their own life experiences in order to understand the text. Metacognitive strategies that link affective and sensory components have been shown to enhance comprehension, possibly through their recruitment of multiple neural pathways. The study’s findings reinforce previous research suggesting that students using ‘think-and-feel-alouds’ had more positive opinions about poetry, wrote longer responses and had greater levels of participation in class discussions than students who received traditional-style poetry instruction.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Poetry
Literacy
Literature
Emotions
Thought and thinking
Secondary education

Sensitivity to speech rhythm explains individual differences in reading ability independently of phonological awareness

Volume 26 Number 3, September 2008; Pages 357–367
Andrew J. Holliman, Clare Wood, Kieron Sheehy

A recent study has drawn attention to the role of speech rhythm perception in reading development. Forty-four 5- and 6-year-olds at a primary school in England completed a series of six tests that covered phoneme deletion, rhyme detection, the British Ability Scales (BAS) word reading test, nonword reading, vocabulary and stress manipulation. The stress manipulation task involved children listening to spoken words to identify 16 objects in a line drawing of a house. All of the object names had two syllables with primary lexical stress on the first syllable and a reduced vowel in the second syllable, for example ‘sofa’. After demonstrating that they could identify all of the objects, children were asked to point to the object after hearing the word with its stress patterning reversed, with ‘sofa’ pronounced ‘s’far’. They received one practice item before commencing the test to make the task clear. As expected, the average score on this task was generally low, averaging 6.3 objects correctly located out of the possible 16. It was found that stress manipulation was significantly correlated with phonological awareness and with the two measures of reading ability, BAS score and nonword reading. After age and vocabulary were taken into account, phoneme deletion accounted for 11.2 per cent of the variance in reading level, and rhyme detection accounted for an additional 5.7 per cent. Metrical stress sensitivity was also a statistically significant contributor, accounting for an additional 3.8 per cent of the variance. This suggests that stress sensitivity has a connection with reading ability that is independent of its association with phonological awareness. It is therefore argued that stress sensitivity must be included as an additional route, outside of phonological awareness, in current theories of reading development.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Reading
Literacy
Primary education
Great Britain

Starting out in teaching: surviving or thriving as a new teacher

Volume 3,  2007; Pages 32–37
Marie Cameron, Susan Lovett, Jennifer Garvey Berger

Teachers’ experiences in their first year of teaching are critical. A five-year study of promising first-year New Zealand teachers has identified the aspects of teacher induction programs which are most influential in helping new teachers to feel positive and successful in their work. The 57 teachers in the study had all been nominated by their teacher educators as someone likely to make a significant contribution to teaching. Thirty-five per cent were male and 63 per cent were below 30 years of age. Twenty-five were currently teaching in primary schools, 11 in intermediate schools, and 21 in secondary schools. The teachers identified three categories of induction experiences as most helpful. A difference was found between primary and secondary school environments, with primary school teachers tending to work in the most encouraging schools and most secondary teachers working in less encouraging school environments. Beneficial leadership and organisational practices included assigning smaller and more manageable classes to beginning teachers and limiting their classes to subjects they were qualified to teach. Organisational practices providing emotional support for beginning teachers are extremely important but often neglected. Beginning teachers felt most comfortable in schools where mistakes were seen as normal, and where it was recognised that being a new teacher is difficult. Teachers in the study appreciated principals and mentors who reminded them to look after their health and protected them from overwork. Collective approaches to teaching were more common in primary schools, but some secondary schools fostered a supportive environment through experienced colleagues’ open-door practices and openness to questions. The new teachers also valued opportunities to participate in collaborative teaching activities. Having an experienced and committed tutor teacher, or mentor, was also seen as important. Good mentoring practice involved modelling classroom practices and observing the new teacher as they tried them, and allowing regular, substantial ‘quality time’ with the new teacher. The activity identified as most helpful was watching other teachers teach. Formal observations and the resulting formative feedback were also seen as valuable.

KLA

Subject Headings

Teaching and learning
Teacher training
New Zealand

Can computers tutor students as effectively as teachers?

March 2008; Pages 8–9
Ken Luterbach, Jeanie Cole

In this Point/Counterpoint column, Ken Luterbach argues the ‘Yes’ case and Jeanie Cole the ‘No’ case. Luterbach cites research that has continually found that computer-aided instruction and teacher-led instruction are equally effective in terms of student achievement. For students who are struggling, computer-based instruction may even help more. Computer instruction is often motivating for students, particularly if it is well designed. Software should be designed and selected according to Keller’s ARCS model, so that it draws student attention, is relevant, progressively increases the confidence of learners, and provides students with satisfaction. Computer instruction cannot replace teachers, since human attention is needed for managing groups of children. However, it does allow individual attention, instant feedback and inexhaustible patience. Computer training can be likened to surgical simulation software and pilot training programs, which offer undeniable benefits beyond human instruction. For the No case, Cole argues that while computer software should be part of a toolkit of motivating instructional strategies, teachers add a fundamental human element. They teach children to make connections with people, challenge and extend them and can adapt to personalities and learning preferences. She refers to her experience in an at-risk classroom in which she got to know students and their parents, took an interest in them, and encouraged and praised them in areas outside the classroom. Students responded to this human support and made significant progress. Teachers can also arrange classes into groups for collaborative projects and provide materials for tactile, visual and kinaesthetic learners. Computers are an important classroom resource but cannot provide a complete learning system.

Key Learning Areas

Technology

Subject Headings

Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
Technology
Teaching and learning

There are no Conferences available in this issue.